United States v. Alejandro Aguirre
This text of 420 F. App'x 678 (United States v. Alejandro Aguirre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Alejandro Yliz Aguirre appeals from his conviction for various drug offenses. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Aguirre contends that the district court’s instruction to the grand jury violated the Fifth Amendment by improperly limiting the grand jury’s discretion. This contention fails because the instructions here substantially mirrored those approved in United States v. Cortez-Rivera, 454 F.3d 1038, 1040 (9th Cir.2006), and United States v. Navarro-Vargas, 408 F.3d 1184 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
420 F. App'x 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alejandro-aguirre-ca9-2011.