United States v. Alejandro Aguirre
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Alejandro Yliz Aguirre appeals from his conviction for various drug offenses. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Aguirre contends that the district court’s instruction to the grand jury violated the Fifth Amendment by improperly limiting the grand jury’s discretion. This contention fails because the instructions here substantially mirrored those approved in United States v. Cortez-Rivera, 454 F.3d 1038, 1040 (9th Cir.2006), and United States v. Navarro-Vargas, 408 F.3d 1184 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
420 F. App'x 678 (United States v. Alejandro Aguirre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.