United States v. Aldridge

18 C.M.A. 585, 18 USCMA 585, 40 C.M.R. 297, 1969 CMA LEXIS 710, 1969 WL 6086
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedSeptember 19, 1969
DocketNo. 22,149
StatusPublished

This text of 18 C.M.A. 585 (United States v. Aldridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Aldridge, 18 C.M.A. 585, 18 USCMA 585, 40 C.M.R. 297, 1969 CMA LEXIS 710, 1969 WL 6086 (cma 1969).

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

The law officer’s inquiry in this case satisfies us that the accused’s plea of guilty to the charge of absence without leave, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886, was providently entered. Cf. United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Care
18 C.M.A. 535 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 C.M.A. 585, 18 USCMA 585, 40 C.M.R. 297, 1969 CMA LEXIS 710, 1969 WL 6086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-aldridge-cma-1969.