United States v. Alcazar
This text of 154 F. App'x 606 (United States v. Alcazar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Marco Alcazar appeals the 121-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a).
Because appellant was sentenced under mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, we remand for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005) (extending Ame[607]*607line’s limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional error under United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)).
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 F. App'x 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alcazar-ca9-2005.