United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.
96 F.3d 1434, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 24590, 1996 WL 515469
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided August 22, 1996·No. 95-7570·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
96 F.3d 1434
U.S.
v.
Alcan Aluminum Corp., BASF Corp., Beazer Materials and
Services, Inc., Borg-Warner Corp., Carrier Corp., Chemical
Leaman Tank Lines Co., Chemical Management, Inc., Chrysler
Motors Corp., Dana Corp., Dart Industries, Inc., Exxon
Corp., Ford Motor Company, Goulds Pumps, Inc., Hitchcock Gas
Engine Co., Ingersoll-Rand, Neapco, Inc., Rome Strip Steel Co.
NO. 95-7570
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Aug 22, 1996
Appeal From: M.D.Pa.,
Vanaskie, J., 892 F.Supp. 648.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp., 96 F.3d 1434, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 24590, 1996 WL 515469 (3d Cir. 1996).
96 F.3d 1434 (United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States of America, State of New York v. Alcan Aluminum Corporation
315 F.3d 179 (Second Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.
97 F. Supp. 2d 248 (N.D. New York, 2000)
United States v. Rohm and Haas Co.
939 F. Supp. 1142 (D. New Jersey, 1996)