United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.

96 F.3d 1434, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 24590, 1996 WL 515469
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedAugust 22, 1996
Docket95-7570
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 96 F.3d 1434 (United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp., 96 F.3d 1434, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 24590, 1996 WL 515469 (3d Cir. 1996).

Opinion

96 F.3d 1434

U.S.
v.
Alcan Aluminum Corp., BASF Corp., Beazer Materials and
Services, Inc., Borg-Warner Corp., Carrier Corp., Chemical
Leaman Tank Lines Co., Chemical Management, Inc., Chrysler
Motors Corp., Dana Corp., Dart Industries, Inc., Exxon
Corp., Ford Motor Company, Goulds Pumps, Inc., Hitchcock Gas
Engine Co., Ingersoll-Rand, Neapco, Inc., Rome Strip Steel Co.

NO. 95-7570

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Aug 22, 1996

Appeal From: M.D.Pa.,

Vanaskie, J., 892 F.Supp. 648.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.
97 F. Supp. 2d 248 (N.D. New York, 2000)
United States v. Rohm and Haas Co.
939 F. Supp. 1142 (D. New Jersey, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 F.3d 1434, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 24590, 1996 WL 515469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alcan-aluminum-corp-ca3-1996.