United States v. Alba-Bahena

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 5, 2007·No. 07-50743·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED December 5, 2007 No. 07-50743 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DANIEL DOMINGO ALBA-BAHENA, also known as Daniel Alva-Baena

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-212-ALL

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Daniel Domingo Alba- Bahena raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 07-50743

28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Alba-Bahena, (5th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Alba-Bahena (United States v. Alba-Bahena) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Pineda-Arrellano
492 F.3d 624 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
Almendarez-Torres v. United States
523 U.S. 224 (Supreme Court, 1998)