United States v. Akinkoye

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Akinkoye

30 F. App'x 133

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Akinkoye. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 F. App'x 179 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2002·No. 01-6438·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Akin Akinkoye appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to compel his trial counsel to produce materials he deems necessary to his anticipated § 2255 motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Akinkoye, No. CR-97-151-PJM (D. Md. filed Oct. 4, 2000 & entered Oct. 5, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Akin Akinkoye appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to compel his trial counsel to produce materials he deems necessary to his anticipated § 2255 motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Akinkoye, No. CR-97-151-PJM (D. Md. filed Oct. 4, 2000 & entered Oct. 5, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Akinkoye, 30 F. App'x 133 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

30 F. App'x 133 (United States v. Akinkoye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.