United States v. Akinkoye
This text of 16 F. App'x 179 (United States v. Akinkoye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Akinbobola Akinkoye seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to compel to produce pretrial discovery and trial motions. The district court entered an order denying AMnkoye’s motion on October 5, 2000. However, Akinkoye did not file a notice of appeal until March 6, 2001, in which he indicated that *180 he did not receive notice of the order to be appealed until that day. Where, as here, a pro se appellant files an untimely notice of appeal offering some excuse for its untimeliness, that notice is properly construed as a motion to reopen the time to note an appeal under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). See United States v. Feuver, 236 F.3d 725, 729 n. 7 (D.C.Cir.2001). Accordingly, we remand the case to the district court for the court to determine whether Aldnkoye can satisfy the requirements of Rule 4(a)(6). See Ogden v. San Juan Cnty., 32 F.3d 452, 454 (10th Cir.1994). The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.
REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 F. App'x 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-akinkoye-ca4-2001.