United States v. Ahmed Burale

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 16, 2024
Docket24-6546
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Ahmed Burale (United States v. Ahmed Burale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ahmed Burale, (4th Cir. 2024).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6546 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6546

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

AHMED SALA ALI BURALE, a/k/a Ahmed Salah Ali, Ahmed Hindi, Ahmed Salah Ali Burle,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (2:11-cr-00034-RBS-DEM-13)

Submitted: September 12, 2024 Decided: September 16, 2024

Before THACKER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ahmed Sala Ali Burale, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6546 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Ahmed Sala Ali Burale appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Part B, Subpart 1, of

Amendment 821 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We conclude that the district court

adequately explained its reasons for denying Burale’s motion and that the court did not

abuse its discretion in finding that Burale was ineligible for relief. See United States v.

Martin, 916 F.3d 389, 395 (4th Cir. 2019) (stating standards). Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s judgment. United States v. Burale, No. 2:11-cr-00034-RBS-DEM-13

(E.D. Va. May 10, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Paulette Martin
916 F.3d 389 (Fourth Circuit, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Ahmed Burale, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ahmed-burale-ca4-2024.