United States v. Agustin Patino-Almendariz

646 F. App'x 355
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 2016
Docket15-41144
StatusUnpublished

This text of 646 F. App'x 355 (United States v. Agustin Patino-Almendariz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Agustin Patino-Almendariz, 646 F. App'x 355 (5th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Agustín- Patino-Almendariz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Patino-Almendariz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
646 F. App'x 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-agustin-patino-almendariz-ca5-2016.