United States v. Aguilar
This text of United States v. Aguilar (United States v. Aguilar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7325
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JUAN ANTONIO AGUILAR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-00-330, CA-02-2529)
Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: October 31, 2002
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Juan Antonio Aguilar, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Juan Antonio Aguilar seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons
stated by the district court that Aguilar has not made a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See
United States v. Aguilar, Nos. CR-00-330; CA-02-2529 (D.S.C.
Aug. 16, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability
and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Aguilar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-aguilar-ca4-2002.