United States v. Adderly

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Adderly

120 F. App'x 983

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 7, 2005·No. No. 04-7905·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lorenzo Adderly appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a downward departure in his sentence. Because Adderly had no pending challenge to his sentence and no court had ordered his resentencing, we affirm the district court’s determination that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the motion for a downward departure. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Lorenzo Adderly appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a downward departure in his sentence. Because Adderly had no pending challenge to his sentence and no court had ordered his resentencing, we affirm the district court’s determination that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the motion for a downward departure. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Adderly, 120 F. App'x 983 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

120 F. App'x 983 (United States v. Adderly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.