United States v. Adderly

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7093

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LORENZO ADDERLY, a/k/a Kendrick A. McKenzie, a/k/a Son-Son,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-74)

Submitted: October 23, 2003 Decided: October 31, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lorenzo Adderly, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Lorenzo Adderly appeals from the district court’s order

denying his motion for a downward departure in his sentence.

Because Adderly had no pending challenge to his sentence and no

court had ordered his resentencing, we affirm the district court’s

determination that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the motion for

a downward departure. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED