United States v. Adams
This text of United States v. Adams (United States v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 25-50063 Document: 72-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/19/2026
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 25-50063 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ May 19, 2026 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Patrick Dwayne Adams,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:24-CR-88-3 ______________________________
Before Stewart, Graves, and Oldham, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Patrick Dwayne Adams pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting the possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. On appeal, he contends that there was an insufficient factual basis for the guilty plea and that the district court failed to properly ensure that he understood the nature of the charge.
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-50063 Document: 72-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/19/2026
No. 25-50063
We review for plain error. See United States v. Vonn, 535 U.S. 55, 59 (2002). In light of the entire record, Adams fails to show clear or obvious error. See United States v. Trejo, 610 F.3d 308, 313 (5th Cir. 2010) (factual basis); United States v. Cuevas-Andrade, 232 F.3d 440, 444 (5th Cir. 2000) (nature of the charges). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Adams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-adams-ca5-2026.