United States v. Adams

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2025·No. 25-10465·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 25-10465 Document: 38-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/11/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 25-10465 September 11, 2025 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Ceasar Lamar Adams,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:24-CR-49-1 ______________________________

Before Richman, Southwick, and Willett, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Caesar Lamar Adams has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Adams has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-10465 Document: 38-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/11/2025

No. 25-10465

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Adams, (5th Cir. 2025).

United States v. Adams (United States v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)