United States v. Adams
15 F. App'x 187
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 29, 2001·No. 01-6062·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Timothy Adams appeals from the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Adams, Nos. CR-94-302; CA-97-1225-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 19, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Adams, 15 F. App'x 187 (4th Cir. 2001).
15 F. App'x 187 (United States v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adams v. United States
535 U.S. 1042 (Supreme Court, 2002)