United States v. Adams
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6020
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JERRY LEE ADAMS, a/k/a Clown,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CR-94-248)
Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 4, 1999
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Lee Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Jerry Lee Adams appeals from the district court’s order deny-
ing his motion for resentencing. Our review of the record and the
district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. According-
ly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United
States v. Adams, No. CR-94-248 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 16, 1998). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Adams (United States v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.