United States v. Adams

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 4, 1999·No. 99-6020·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JERRY LEE ADAMS, a/k/a Clown,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CR-94-248)

Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 4, 1999

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Lee Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jerry Lee Adams appeals from the district court’s order deny-

ing his motion for resentencing. Our review of the record and the

district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. According-

ly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United

States v. Adams, No. CR-94-248 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 16, 1998). We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Adams, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Adams (United States v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.