United States v. Aaron Lyles

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 1, 2025
Docket25-6048
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Aaron Lyles (United States v. Aaron Lyles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Aaron Lyles, (4th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6048 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6047

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

AARON JEROME LYLES,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 25-6048

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City and Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (4:00-cr-00055-FL-1; 2:00-cr-00024-FL-1)

Submitted: March 27, 2025 Decided: April 1, 2025 USCA4 Appeal: 25-6048 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/01/2025 Pg: 2 of 3

Before THACKER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron Jerome Lyles, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 USCA4 Appeal: 25-6048 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/01/2025 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Jerome Lyles appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motions for compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. See United States v. Davis, 99 F.4th 647, 653-56, 657-59 (4th Cir.

2024) (stating standard of review, addressing determinations district court must make to

grant relief, addressing parameters governing district court’s consideration of factors raised

for relief, and acknowledging that court need not equally weigh all factors). Accordingly,

we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Lyles, Nos. 4:00-cr-00055-FL-1; 2:00-

cr-00024-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Antonio Davis
99 F.4th 647 (Fourth Circuit, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Aaron Lyles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-aaron-lyles-ca4-2025.