United States v. 408 Peyton Road

133 F.3d 1378, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 1028
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 23, 1998
Docket95-8330
StatusPublished

This text of 133 F.3d 1378 (United States v. 408 Peyton Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. 408 Peyton Road, 133 F.3d 1378, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 1028 (11th Cir. 1998).

Opinion

133 F.3d 1378

11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1029

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
408 PEYTON ROAD, S.W., Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia,
Including all buildings and appurtenances thereon,
described in Exhibit A attached,
Defendant-Appellant,
451 Hope Court, S.W., Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia,
Including all buildings and appurtenances thereon,
described in Exhibit B attached, Defendant,
Robert Richardson, Claimant-Appellant,
Carswell Denson, et al., Claimants.

No. 95-8330.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 23, 1998.

Jerome C. Ware, Ware & Otonicar, Smyrna, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Earle Antoine Davidson, Giddens, Davidson & Mitchell, Atlanta, GA, for Claimants.

Albert L. Kemp, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.*

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion: 112 F.3d 1106 (11th Cir.1997)).

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby

VACATED.

*

Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Peter T. Fay has elected to not participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 F.3d 1378, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 1028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-408-peyton-road-ca11-1998.