United States of America v. Melvin Stanford

2023 DNH 031
District Court, D. New Hampshire·Decided March 29, 2023·No. 19-cr-47-10-SM·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 19-cr-47-2-SM Opinion No. 2023 DNH 031

Melvin Stanford

ORDER

Defendant was convicted and sentenced to 108 months of incarceration for serious drug offenses. He now seeks an order releasing him from prison for compassionate reasons, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), based on his medical conditions (hypertension, type 2 diabetes, high cholesterol), and the heightened risk those conditions pose should he contract the COVID-19 virus or any of its mutations. Indeed defendant previously was infected with COVID when detained at the Strafford County House of Corrections in 2020.

His earlier case provides him with some degree of protection against serious COVID illness in the future, but he has declined to be vaccinated. The government reports that nearly 95% of the inmates at the Danbury facility where defendant is incarcerated have been vaccinated, which no doubt also assists in controlling the spread of disease and tempers serious illness if the virus is transmitted. While defendant need not protect himself further by accepting the effective

vaccinations developed over the past few years, it is difficult to conclude that his risk of serious COVID-related illness is “extraordinary” and “compelling”; so warrants compassionate release. “The risk is self-incurred.” United States v. Broadfield, 5 F.4th 801, 803 (7th Cir. 2021).

But, even if defendant’s medical conditions and risks associated with COVID-19 exposure did qualify as extraordinary and compelling grounds for compassionate release, the seriousness of his offenses and risk of danger he poses to the community weigh heavily against granting compassionate release. See United States v. Chambliss, 948 F.3d 691, 694 (5th Cir. 2020). As the government points out, defendant is a recidivist drug dealer with a history of unlawful firearms possession.

Conclusion

For the reasons given and those argued by the government in its opposition, the motion for compassionate release (doc. no. 408) is denied.

SO ORDERED.

Steven J. McAuliffe

United States District Judge

March 29, 2023

cc: Georgiana MacDonald, AUSA Anna Z. Krasinski, AUSA Kristin Weberg, Esq.

U.S. Probation U.S. Marshal

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States of America v. Melvin Stanford, 2023 DNH 031 (D.N.H. 2023).

2023 DNH 031 (United States of America v. Melvin Stanford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Orbie Chambliss
948 F.3d 691 (Fifth Circuit, 2020)
United States v. Brian Broadfield
5 F.4th 801 (Seventh Circuit, 2021)