United States of America v. Melvin Stanford
This text of 2023 DNH 031 (United States of America v. Melvin Stanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
United States of America
v. Case No. 19-cr-47-2-SM Opinion No. 2023 DNH 031 Melvin Stanford
ORDER
Defendant was convicted and sentenced to 108 months of
incarceration for serious drug offenses. He now seeks an order
releasing him from prison for compassionate reasons, 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A), based on his medical conditions (hypertension,
type 2 diabetes, high cholesterol), and the heightened risk
those conditions pose should he contract the COVID-19 virus or
any of its mutations. Indeed defendant previously was infected
with COVID when detained at the Strafford County House of
Corrections in 2020.
His earlier case provides him with some degree of
protection against serious COVID illness in the future, but he
has declined to be vaccinated. The government reports that
nearly 95% of the inmates at the Danbury facility where
defendant is incarcerated have been vaccinated, which no doubt
also assists in controlling the spread of disease and tempers
serious illness if the virus is transmitted. While defendant
need not protect himself further by accepting the effective
1 vaccinations developed over the past few years, it is difficult
to conclude that his risk of serious COVID-related illness is
“extraordinary” and “compelling”; so warrants compassionate
release. “The risk is self-incurred.” United States v.
Broadfield, 5 F.4th 801, 803 (7th Cir. 2021).
But, even if defendant’s medical conditions and risks
associated with COVID-19 exposure did qualify as extraordinary
and compelling grounds for compassionate release, the
seriousness of his offenses and risk of danger he poses to the
community weigh heavily against granting compassionate release.
See United States v. Chambliss, 948 F.3d 691, 694 (5th Cir.
2020). As the government points out, defendant is a recidivist
drug dealer with a history of unlawful firearms possession.
Conclusion
For the reasons given and those argued by the government in
its opposition, the motion for compassionate release (doc. no.
408) is denied.
SO ORDERED.
____________________________ Steven J. McAuliffe United States District Judge
March 29, 2023
cc: Georgiana MacDonald, AUSA Anna Z. Krasinski, AUSA Kristin Weberg, Esq. U.S. Probation U.S. Marshal
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2023 DNH 031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-v-melvin-stanford-nhd-2023.