United States of America v. Eric Treantos

2020 DNH 187
District Court, D. New Hampshire·Decided October 27, 2020·No. 15-cr-187-1-SM·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

United States of America

v. Case No. 15-cr-187-1-SM Opinion No. 2020 DNH 187

Eric Treantos

ORDER

Defendant’s motion for “compassionate release” from incarceration under the First Step Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(a)(1)(A), given the COVID-19 pandemic, is properly before the court as defendant has exhausted available administrative remedies. Doc. No. 73.

The burden is on defendant to show that he is entitled to relief, that is 1) that extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant a reduction in his sentence, and 2) such a reduction would be consistent with the sentencing factors set out in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) as well as Sentencing Commission Policies (though that is not strictly required under the First Step Act).

Here, the government concedes that defendant’s medical conditions place him in a high-risk category should he contract COVID-19, and that defendant has met his burden to show

“extraordinary and compelling” reasons warranting sentence reduction. But, says the government, the sentencing factors weigh heavily against defendant’s early release, particularly the danger defendant poses to the community. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g); USSG § 1B1.13(2).

The risk management procedures at FCI Danbury, where defendant is incarcerated, have been both extensive and, recently, largely successful in controlling the spread of the virus, and there is currently no active outbreak. The current risk of contracting the virus is low. And, defendant’s history strongly militates against release.

Defendant was convicted of distribution of child pornography and possession of child pornography and sentenced to 210 months of confinement. He has served only a small portion of that sentence and he has not met his burden to show that he no longer poses a danger to the safety of the community. Defendant’s likelihood of recidivism is high, his offense conduct included inducing minors to engage in sexual activity to record them, which conduct poses a genuine threat to children in the community. In addition, defendant’s early release would, under these circumstances, be inconsistent with the sentencing goals of promoting respect for the law, imposing a just

punishment, protecting the public, and providing for both general and specific deterrence. 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Conclusion

Given the current low risk of community spread of the virus in the facility, the danger to public safety defendant would pose if released, and the sentencing factors militating against defendant’s early release, the motion for compassionate release under the First Step Act is hereby denied.

SO ORDERED.

Steven J. McAuliffe

United States District Judge

October 27, 2020

cc: Debra M. Walsh, AUSA Charles J. Keefe, Esq.

U.S. Probation U.S. Marshal

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States of America v. Eric Treantos, 2020 DNH 187 (D.N.H. 2020).

2020 DNH 187 (United States of America v. Eric Treantos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related