UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF—APPELLEE v. ALFRED ARNOLD AMELINE, DEFENDANT—APPELLANT

401 F.3d 1007
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 11, 2005·No. 02-30326·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

401 F.3d 1007

UNITED STATES OF America, Plaintiff—Appellee,
v.
Alfred Arnold AMELINE, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-30326.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 11, 2005.

Lori Harper Suek, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, Michael Rotker, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Steven F. Hubachek, Esq., Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

David M. Porter, Esq., Federal Public Defender's Office, Sacramento, CA, Anthony R. Gallagher, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Amicus.

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF—APPELLEE v. ALFRED ARNOLD AMELINE, DEFENDANT—APPELLANT, 401 F.3d 1007 (9th Cir. 2005).

401 F.3d 1007 (UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF—APPELLEE v. ALFRED ARNOLD AMELINE, DEFENDANT—APPELLANT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Alfred Arnold Ameline
409 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)