UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee Roy PARKER, Defendant-Appellant
146 F.3d 696, 98 Daily Journal DAR 6122, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4449, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 12336, 1998 WL 304538
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 11, 1998
Docket97-30199
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 146 F.3d 696 (UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee Roy PARKER, Defendant-Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee Roy PARKER, Defendant-Appellant, 146 F.3d 696, 98 Daily Journal DAR 6122, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4449, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 12336, 1998 WL 304538 (9th Cir. 1998).
Opinions
Order; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.
[697]*697ORDER
An active judge sua sponte requested that the court rehear this case en banc. The request failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges. The request is rejected.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee Roy PARKER, Defendant-Appellant
146 F.3d 696 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
146 F.3d 696, 98 Daily Journal DAR 6122, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4449, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 12336, 1998 WL 304538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-plaintiff-appellee-v-lee-roy-parker-ca9-1998.