United States of America Ex Rel. Edward McCoy v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford, Pennsylvania
This text of 419 F.2d 118 (United States of America Ex Rel. Edward McCoy v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford, Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Relator is a state prisoner presently serving a sentence for burglary of a telephone booth. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court denied relief, but noted probable cause for appeal.
Relator makes two assertions. First, that failure to provide counsel at a preliminary hearing is a denial of due process. Second, that he was denied effective assistance of counsel both at trial and sentencing. The district court, in an unreported opinion, thoroughly analyzed each of these contentions and dismissed them. After careful examination of the record, we find no error.
The order of the district court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
419 F.2d 118, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-edward-mccoy-v-alfred-t-rundle-ca3-1969.