United States of America Ex Rel. Edward McCoy v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford, Pennsylvania

419 F.2d 118, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9788
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 8, 1969·No. 17932·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Relator is a state prisoner presently serving a sentence for burglary of a telephone booth. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court denied relief, but noted probable cause for appeal.

Relator makes two assertions. First, that failure to provide counsel at a preliminary hearing is a denial of due process. Second, that he was denied effective assistance of counsel both at trial and sentencing. The district court, in an unreported opinion, thoroughly analyzed each of these contentions and dismissed them. After careful examination of the record, we find no error.

The order of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States of America Ex Rel. Edward McCoy v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford, Pennsylvania, 419 F.2d 118, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9788 (3d Cir. 1969).

419 F.2d 118 (United States of America Ex Rel. Edward McCoy v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford, Pennsylvania) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related