United States of America Ex Rel. Anfield Bowers v. Edward M. Fay, Warden, Green Haven Prison and People of the State of New York

266 F.2d 824, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3965
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedApril 28, 1959
Docket25354
StatusPublished

This text of 266 F.2d 824 (United States of America Ex Rel. Anfield Bowers v. Edward M. Fay, Warden, Green Haven Prison and People of the State of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States of America Ex Rel. Anfield Bowers v. Edward M. Fay, Warden, Green Haven Prison and People of the State of New York, 266 F.2d 824, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3965 (2d Cir. 1959).

Opinion

266 F.2d 824

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Anfield BOWERS, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Edward M. FAY, Warden, Green Haven Prison and People of the
State of New York, Respondents-Appellants.

No. 235, Docket 25354.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 6, 1959.
Decided April 28, 1959.

Joseph D. Tekulsky, New York City (Frederick B. Boyden, New York City, on the brief), for petitioner-appellee.

George K. Bernstein, Asst. Atty. Gen. of the State of New York (Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., Paxton Blair, Sol. Gen., Albany, N.Y., Harold Borgwald and Allan N. Smiley, Asst. Attys. Gen., State of New York, on the brief), for respondents-appellants.

Before HINCKS, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss as moot is denied, Judge Hincks dissenting.

On the merits, the Attorney General of the State of New York in behalf of the appellants questions controverted issues of fact found against the appellants by Judge Weinfeld. We think the findings sufficiently supported by the evidence: certainly they were not clearly erroneous.

On the opinion below, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1958, 171 F.Supp. 558, the judgment is affirmed.1

1

We wish to thank Messrs. Tekulsky and Boyden for their able representation of Bowers both the and below

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States ex rel. Bowers v. Fay
266 F.2d 824 (Second Circuit, 1959)
People ex rel. Bowers v. Fay
171 F. Supp. 558 (S.D. New York, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 F.2d 824, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-ex-rel-anfield-bowers-v-edward-m-fay-warden-ca2-1959.