United States ex rel. Bowers v. Fay

Second Circuit

United States ex rel. Bowers v. Fay

266 F.2d 824

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 28, 1959

DocketNo. 235, Docket 25354

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 266 F.2d 824 (United States ex rel. Bowers v. Fay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States ex rel. Bowers v. Fay, 266 F.2d 824 (2d Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss as moot is de.nied, Judge Hincks dissenting.

On the merits, the Attorney General of the State of New York in behalf of the appellants questions controverted issues of fact found against the appellants by Judge Weinfeld. We think the findings sufficiently supported by the evidence: certainly they were not clearly erroneous.

On the opinion below, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1958, 171 F.Supp. 558, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss as moot is de.nied, Judge Hincks dissenting.

On the merits, the Attorney General of the State of New York in behalf of the appellants questions controverted issues of fact found against the appellants by Judge Weinfeld. We think the findings sufficiently supported by the evidence: certainly they were not clearly erroneous.

On the opinion below, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1958, 171 F.Supp. 558, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 F.2d 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-bowers-v-fay-ca2-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack