United States ex rel. Bowers v. Fay
266 F.2d 824
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 28, 1959·No. No. 235, Docket 25354·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The motion to dismiss as moot is de.nied, Judge Hincks dissenting.
On the merits, the Attorney General of the State of New York in behalf of the appellants questions controverted issues of fact found against the appellants by Judge Weinfeld. We think the findings sufficiently supported by the evidence: certainly they were not clearly erroneous.
On the opinion below, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1958, 171 F.Supp. 558, the judgment is affirmed.
We wish to thank Messrs. Tekulsky and Boyden for their able representation of Bowers both here and below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States ex rel. Bowers v. Fay, 266 F.2d 824 (2d Cir. 1959).
266 F.2d 824 (United States ex rel. Bowers v. Fay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States Ex Rel. Franklin Lanear, Relator-Appellant v. Hon. J. Edwin Lavallee, as Warden of Clinton State Prison, Dannemora, New York
306 F.2d 417 (Second Circuit, 1962)
United States Ex Rel. Foreman v. Fay
184 F. Supp. 535 (S.D. New York, 1960)
United States of America Ex Rel. Anfield Bowers v. Edward M. Fay, Warden, Green Haven Prison and People of the State of New York
266 F.2d 824 (Second Circuit, 1959)