United States of America, and v. Oralia Delacerda, And

Ninth Circuit

United States of America, and v. Oralia Delacerda, And

474 F.2d 857, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11664

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 13, 1973

Docket72-3113

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 474 F.2d 857 (United States of America, and v. Oralia Delacerda, And) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States of America, and v. Oralia Delacerda, And, 474 F.2d 857, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11664 (9th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this case for attempting to board an aircraft of Pacific Southwest Airlines with a concealed weapon is affirmed.

Defendant contends the Pacific Southwest Airlines (PSA) was not engaged in “air transportation.” See 49 U.S.C. § 1301(10).

Inasmuch as PSA, although not certificated by the Civil Aeronautics Board, was properly engaged in the transportation of United States mails on some routes, we hold that 49 U.S.C. § 1472(1) was violated by Delacerda.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this case for attempting to board an aircraft of Pacific Southwest Airlines with a concealed weapon is affirmed.

Defendant contends the Pacific Southwest Airlines (PSA) was not engaged in “air transportation.” See 49 U.S.C. § 1301(10).

Inasmuch as PSA, although not certificated by the Civil Aeronautics Board, was properly engaged in the transportation of United States mails on some routes, we hold that 49 U.S.C. § 1472(1) was violated by Delacerda.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

474 F.2d 857, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-america-and-v-oralia-delacerda-and-ca9-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack