United States of Amcerica v. Charles Vernon Hawkins
Opinions
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.
. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.
The appellant claims the following errors :
(1) The indictment should have been dismissed because the statute under which he was indicted was amended prior to trial; (2) The punishment provided by statute is cruel and unusual in violation of the Eighth Amendment; (3) The court should have granted his motion to suppress and should not have permitted a box of ammunition to be admitted into evidence; and (4) His prison and fingerprint records should not have been admitted into evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
444 F.2d 224 (United States of Amcerica v. Charles Vernon Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.