United States of Amcerica v. Charles Vernon Hawkins
This text of 444 F.2d 224 (United States of Amcerica v. Charles Vernon Hawkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.
. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.
The appellant claims the following errors :
(1) The indictment should have been dismissed because the statute under which he was indicted was amended prior to trial; (2) The punishment provided by statute is cruel and unusual in violation of the Eighth Amendment; (3) The court should have granted his motion to suppress and should not have permitted a box of ammunition to be admitted into evidence; and (4) His prison and fingerprint records should not have been admitted into evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 F.2d 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-of-amcerica-v-charles-vernon-hawkins-ca5-1971.