United States Ex Rel. United States Rubber Co. v. Ambursen Dam Co.

3 F. Supp. 548, 1933 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1656
District Court, N.D. California·Decided May 4, 1933·No. 743·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

KERRIGAN, District Judge.

The Honorable William A. Beasley, appointed as special master in the above-entitled cause, has at my request prepared an abridgment of the two opinions he filed herein. It states fully and clearly the legal principles upon which I overruled the exceptions to the master’s report, and, for purposes of publication, I herewith adopt it as the opinion of the court in ruling upon said exceptions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Ex Rel. United States Rubber Co. v. Ambursen Dam Co., 3 F. Supp. 548, 1933 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1656 (N.D. Cal. 1933).

3 F. Supp. 548 (United States Ex Rel. United States Rubber Co. v. Ambursen Dam Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCree & Company v. State
91 N.W.2d 713 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1958)
Continental Casualty Co. v. Clarence L. Boyd Co.
140 F.2d 115 (Tenth Circuit, 1944)
United States ex rel. Shlager v. MacNeil Bros.
27 F. Supp. 180 (D. Massachusetts, 1939)
United States v. Seaboard Surety Co.
26 F. Supp. 681 (D. Montana, 1938)