United States ex rel. Rogers v. Davis

323 F.2d 653
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 25, 1963
DocketNo. 20436
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 323 F.2d 653 (United States ex rel. Rogers v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States ex rel. Rogers v. Davis, 323 F.2d 653 (5th Cir. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from the denial, without a plenary hearing, of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Appellant, a Negro under a death sentence for murder imposed by the State District Court for Evangeline Parish, Louisiana, alleged that his conviction was unconstitutionally obtained because for many years Negroes had been systematically excluded from jury venires and particularly from the grand jury which indicted him and the petit jury which convicted him. The District Court dismissed appellant’s application upon the ground that he had not exhausted all of his State remedies, particularly under the Louisiana Habeas Corpus Statute, LSA-R.S. 15:113-15:141.

Appellant’s contention as here made was presented, passed upon, and found adversely to him, both by the State trial court and the State Supreme Court. State v. Rogers, 241 La. 841, 132 So.2d 819 at 843-845. An application for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court was denied. 370 U.S. 963, 82 S.Ct. 1589, 8 L.Ed.2d 830.

It is now firmly settled that, before bringing a federal habeas corpus action, a convicted state prisoner need not repetitiously seek relief from the State where the same federal constitutional issues already have been decided against his contentions by the State Courts. Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 73 S.Ct. 397, 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953) ; Whitus v. Balkcom, 299 F.2d 844 (C.A. 5, 1962), reversed, per curiam 370 U.S. 728, 82 S.Ct. 1575, 8 L.Ed.2d 803 (1962); Daugharty v. Gladden, 257 F.2d 750, 754 (C.A. 9, 1958).

The judgment of the District Court is reversed and the matter is remanded for a hearing on the merits of the petition for habeas corpus.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Heyd
277 F. Supp. 899 (E.D. Louisiana, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
323 F.2d 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-rogers-v-davis-ca5-1963.