Marakar v. United States

370 U.S. 723, 82 S. Ct. 1573, 8 L. Ed. 2d 803, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 859
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 25, 1962·No. 1191 M·Published·Cited by 34 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. On motion of the Solicitor General and upon an examination of the entire record, the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments are vacated, and the causes are remanded to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey with directions to dismiss the indictments.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Brennan join the Court’s disposition because they believe that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment was an insurmountable barrier to the prosecution of these petitioners under the separate indictments returned on April 26,1961, charging each petitioner with a substantive offense of illegally bringing opium into this country. See Abbate v. United States, 359 U. S. 187, 196 (separate opinion); cf. Petite v. United States, 361 U. S. 529, 533 (dissenting opinion).

Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marakar v. United States, 370 U.S. 723, 82 S. Ct. 1573, 8 L. Ed. 2d 803, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 859 (1962).

370 U.S. 723 (Marakar v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Whitehorn
710 F. Supp. 803 (District of Columbia, 1989)
State v. Williams
639 P.2d 1043 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1981)
Thompson v. United States
444 U.S. 248 (Supreme Court, 1980)
United States v. Patrick Defillipo and James Defillipo
590 F.2d 1228 (Second Circuit, 1979)
United States v. Bruce Thompson
579 F.2d 1184 (Tenth Circuit, 1978)
Rinaldi v. United States
434 U.S. 22 (Supreme Court, 1977)
United States v. Ralph Jacobson
547 F.2d 21 (Second Circuit, 1977)
United States v. Frank F. Colacurcio
514 F.2d 1 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Eugene Crutch, A/K/A Charles Jenkins
461 F.2d 1200 (Second Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Grau
341 F. Supp. 343 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1972)
United States v. Benjamin Seewald, Contemnor-Appellant
450 F.2d 1159 (Second Circuit, 1971)
United States v. James W. Williams
431 F.2d 1168 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
Francisco Pena-Cabanillas v. United States
394 F.2d 785 (Ninth Circuit, 1968)
Paul Santo Orlando v. United States
387 F.2d 348 (Ninth Circuit, 1967)
United States v. American Honda Motor Company
273 F. Supp. 810 (N.D. Illinois, 1967)
United States v. American Honda Motor Company
271 F. Supp. 979 (N.D. California, 1967)
State v. Cormier
218 A.2d 138 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1966)