United States ex rel. Comacho v. Follette

429 F.2d 429
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedSeptember 1, 1970
DocketNo. 931, Docket 33667
StatusPublished

This text of 429 F.2d 429 (United States ex rel. Comacho v. Follette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States ex rel. Comacho v. Follette, 429 F.2d 429 (2d Cir. 1970).

Opinion

On remand from the United States Supreme Court.

PER CURIAM:

A judgment denying appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus was reversed by this court on February 2, 1970, 421 F.2d 822, and remanded to the Southern District of New York for further proceedings. Subsequently the Supreme Court of the United States, 398 U.S. 279, 90 S.Ct. 1728, 26 L.Ed.2d 231, granted certiorari and after considering the case vacated the judgment of this court and remanded the case for further consideration in the light of McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 90 S.Ct. 1441, 25 L.Ed. [430]*4302d 763 (1970). In compliance therewith the judgment of this court and the mandate issued pursuant to it were vacated on June 29, 1970.

The judgment of the District Court in this case is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McMann v. Richardson
397 U.S. 759 (Supreme Court, 1970)
Follette v. Comacho
398 U.S. 279 (Supreme Court, 1970)
Higgins v. United States
398 U.S. 279 (Supreme Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
429 F.2d 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-comacho-v-follette-ca2-1970.