Follette v. Comacho

398 U.S. 279, 90 S. Ct. 1728
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 1, 1970
DocketNo. 1394
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 398 U.S. 279 (Follette v. Comacho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Follette v. Comacho, 398 U.S. 279, 90 S. Ct. 1728 (1970).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of McMann v. Richardson, 397 U. S. 759.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
398 U.S. 279, 90 S. Ct. 1728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/follette-v-comacho-scotus-1970.