United States ex rel. Brinkley v. Hammond
100 F. 1006, 40 C.C.A. 689, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4361
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 8, 1900
DocketNo. 753
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 100 F. 1006 (United States ex rel. Brinkley v. Hammond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States ex rel. Brinkley v. Hammond, 100 F. 1006, 40 C.C.A. 689, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4361 (6th Cir. 1900).
Opinion
W. A. Brinkley, for petitioner. No opinion. Petition for mandamus was denied, on the grounds set forth in the opinion of Judge Hammond in the ease of Brinkley v. Railroad Co., 95 Fed. 315, in the second paragraph thereof, beginning on page 352.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Edmond C. Fletcher v. Courtney R. Young and Eleanor M. Young, His Wife
222 F.2d 222 (Fourth Circuit, 1955)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
100 F. 1006, 40 C.C.A. 689, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-brinkley-v-hammond-ca6-1900.