United States Automobile Ass'n v. Johnston ex rel. Johnston
This text of 352 So. 2d 1190 (United States Automobile Ass'n v. Johnston ex rel. Johnston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants were among several Defendants against whom Judgments were entered as a result of a personal injury suit. Appellees-Bevilacqua and State Farm were the other Defendants who had settled out after the jury verdict of liability but before the verdict on damages. The court assessed costs against Appellants but not against Bevilacqua and State Farm. Appellants complain that the court should have assessed costs against all Defendants equally even though the Appellee-Defendants settled before the verdict on damages.
Costs awards are generally within the sound discretion of the trial judge, del Real v. Dawson, 320 So.2d 20 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). Appellants have not shown the trial judge abused his discretion. We have considered the remaining points on appeal and find them without merit.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
352 So. 2d 1190, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-automobile-assn-v-johnston-ex-rel-johnston-fladistctapp-1977.