United St Testing v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 17, 1998·No. 97-1687·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the district of columbia circuit

No. 97-1687 September Term, 1998

United States Testing Company, Inc., Petitioner

v.

National Labor Relations Board, Respondent

On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board

Before: Ginsburg, Sentelle, and Rogers, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

It is ORDERED by the Court, sua sponte, that the dissenting opinion filed herein on this date be amended as follows:

Page 1, third paragraph, delete the following sentence: "Indeed, the majority acknowledges that 'the employer never explicitly explained why all of the requested information was needed. Id. at 8.'"

Page 1, line 20, insert the word "the" between "and" and "ratio."

Page 3, line 15, substitute the word "records" for "record."

For the Court: Mark J. Langer, Clerk

Filed on November 13, 1998

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United St Testing v. NLRB, (D.C. Cir. 1998).

United St Testing v. NLRB (United St Testing v. NLRB) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.