United Parcel Service, Inc. and Roland Leal v. Robert Scott Rankin, Individually, Rachelle Rankin, Individually and as Next Friend for Avery Rankin, Kara Rankin, and Samuel Rankin, Minors
This text of United Parcel Service, Inc. and Roland Leal v. Robert Scott Rankin, Individually, Rachelle Rankin, Individually and as Next Friend for Avery Rankin, Kara Rankin, and Samuel Rankin, Minors (United Parcel Service, Inc. and Roland Leal v. Robert Scott Rankin, Individually, Rachelle Rankin, Individually and as Next Friend for Avery Rankin, Kara Rankin, and Samuel Rankin, Minors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 04-014-00494-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 1/15/2015 9:45:06 AM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK
NO. 04-014-00494-CV
FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS IN THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 01/15/2015 9:45:06 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and ROLAND LEAL
Appellants/Cross-Appellees
v.
ROBERT SCOTT RANKIN, Individually; RACHELLE RANKIN, Individually and as Next Friend for AVERY RANKIN, a Minor; as Next Friend for KARA RANKIN, a Minor; and as Next Friend for SAMUEL RANKIN, a Minor
Appellees/Cross-Appellants
On Appeal from the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Honorable Cathy Stryker, Presiding Judge Trial Court Cause No. 2011-CI-07922
APPELLEES’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE BRIEF
TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:
Appellees, Robert Scott Rankin, Rachelle Rankin, Avery Rankin, Kara Rankin,
and Samuel Rankin, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby move the
APPELLEES’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE BRIEF - Page 1 of 4 Court for an Order extending the time to file Appellees’ Response Brief, and as
grounds therefor would show the Court the following:
1. Appellees’ Response Brief is due on or before January 20, 2015.
2. Appellees respectfully request that the Court extend their current briefing
deadline of January 20, 2015, to and including January 30, 2015. No previous
extension of time has been granted for the filing of Appellees’ Response Brief.
3. Undersigned counsel has had an unusually busy schedule in December and
January, primarily due to the holiday season and the work required to prepare for
vacation time around the holiday season. Given that, undersigned counsel has not
had, and will not have, an opportunity to properly prepare the brief on the issues in
this matter by the current deadline.
WHEREFORE, Appellees pray that the time for filing their response brief be
extended to and including January 30, 2015; and for such other and further relief as
the Court may deem to be just and proper.
APPELLEES’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE BRIEF - Page 2 of 4 Respectfully submitted,
THE PERRIN LAW FIRM 1910 Pacific Avenue, Suite 6050 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 646-2004 Facsimile: (214) 646-6117 Email: dougperrin@perrinlaw.org markperrin@perrinlaw.org
/s/J. Mark Perrin Doug Perrin State Bar No. 15796520 J. Mark Perrin State Bar No. 24013313
REESE GORDON MARKETOS LLP 750 N. St. Paul Street, Suite 610 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 382-9810 Facsimile: (214) 501-0731 Email: pete.marketos@rgmfirm.com Pete Marketos State Bar No. 24013101
KEELING & DOWNES, P.C. 1500 McGowen Street Houston, Texas 77004 Telephone: (832) 214-9900 Fax: (832) 214-9908 Email: bck@keelingdownes.com Byron Keeling State Bar No. 11157980
ATTORNEYS FOR CROSS-APPELLANTS
APPELLEES’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE BRIEF - Page 3 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I have conferred with counsel for Appellants/Cross-Appellees about the merits of this Motion and was advised that Appellants/Cross-Appellees do not oppose the relief requested in this Motion.
Certified this 15th day of January, 2015.
/s/J. Mark Perrin J. Mark Perrin
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This will certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document was forwarded to all counsel of record in the above cause through the Court’s electronic case filing system, on this the 15th day of January, 2015.
Ricardo Reyna Audrey Haake Brock, Person, Guerra, Reyna P.C. 17339 Redland Road San Antonio, Texas 78247
W. Randall Bassett Bradley Pratt King & Spalding, LLP 1180 Peachtree Street, NE Atlanta, Georgia 30309
H. Victor Thomas King & Spalding, LLP 1100 Louisiana, Suite 4000 Houston, Texas 77002
/s/J. Mark Perrin
APPELLEES’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE BRIEF - Page 4 of 4
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Roland Leal v. Robert Scott Rankin, Individually, Rachelle Rankin, Individually and as Next Friend for Avery Rankin, Kara Rankin, and Samuel Rankin, Minors, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-parcel-service-inc-and-roland-leal-v-robert-scott-rankin-texapp-2015.