United Motion Theatre Company, a Copartnership, Richard Sloan, and Eugene Sloan v. Thomas H. Ealand, Doing Business as Ferndale Theatre
This text of 199 F.2d 371 (United Motion Theatre Company, a Copartnership, Richard Sloan, and Eugene Sloan v. Thomas H. Ealand, Doing Business as Ferndale Theatre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the hearing of this appeal counsel for appellee was not present and no brief having been filed on behalf of appellee, the appeal was heard upon the record and the brief and oral argument of attorney for the appellants;
And the Court being advised, it is now ordered that the order of June 22, 1950 herein appealed from be modified by the elimination therefrom of the following words in the second literary paragraph thereof:
“copies of all tax returns (including state employment and Federal Income, excess profits, with-holding, social security, payroll, excise and amusement or admission tax), and all related documents, memoranda and supporting data and all other documents, correspondence, papers, and memoranda kept recorded” and the words “all material” in the sentence starting with the words “Including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing.”
And as so modified, the order be and is affirmed. Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 507, 67 S.Ct. 385, 91 L.Ed. 451; Annotation 8 A.L.R.2d 1134; Garrett v. Fau, D.C., 8 F.R.D. 556; Welty v. Clute, D.C., 2 F.R.D. 429; O’Connell v. Olsen & Ugelstadt, D.C., 10 F.R.D. 142.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 F.2d 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-motion-theatre-company-a-copartnership-richard-sloan-and-eugene-ca6-1952.