Austin v. Aluminum Co. of America
This text of 15 F.R.D. 490 (Austin v. Aluminum Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant has moved that plaintiffs be required to produce for inspection and reproduction their income tax returns for the calendar years 1945 through 1953, pursuant to Rule 34, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.
By force of statute, income tax returns are confidential communications between the' taxpayer and the government, not directly available to third parties except as provided by law or regulations. 26 U.S.C. § 55. No statutory or regulatory rule exists for the invasion of privilege here sought by defendant. What is not directly available should not be made indirectly available by court order in an action between private litigants. United Motion Theatre Co. v. Ealand, 6 Cir., 199 F.2d 371; Maddox v. Wright, D.C., 103 F.Supp. 400; O’Connell v. Olsen & Ugelstadt, D.C., 10 F.R.D. 142; Garrett v. Faust, D.C., 8 F.R.D. 556; Welty v. Clute, D.C., 2 F.R.D. 429.
It is, accordingly, ordered by the Court that defendant’s motion be, and it hereby is, denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 F.R.D. 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-aluminum-co-of-america-tned-1954.