United Marine, Inc. v. Raill

584 So. 2d 1137, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9259, 1991 WL 174524
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 10, 1991
DocketNo. 91-678
StatusPublished

This text of 584 So. 2d 1137 (United Marine, Inc. v. Raill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United Marine, Inc. v. Raill, 584 So. 2d 1137, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9259, 1991 WL 174524 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

United Marine, Inc., appeals a temporary injunction entered in a suit on a covenant not to compete, asserting that it was entitled to greater injunctive relief than that granted by the trial court. “The granting or denying of a temporary injunction is a matter within the discretion of the trial court, and the exercise of such discretion will not be disturbed on appeal unless a clear showing is made that there was an abuse.” Cordis Corp. v. Prooslin, 482 So.2d 486, 490-91 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Cordis enumerates the factors to be considered, and no abuse of discretion in applying those factors has been shown. See also § 542.33, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1990).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cordis Corp. v. Prooslin
482 So. 2d 486 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
584 So. 2d 1137, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9259, 1991 WL 174524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-marine-inc-v-raill-fladistctapp-1991.