United Christian Baptist Church, Inc. v. Berman

55 Misc. 2d 153, 284 N.Y.S.2d 601, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1136
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 31, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 55 Misc. 2d 153 (United Christian Baptist Church, Inc. v. Berman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United Christian Baptist Church, Inc. v. Berman, 55 Misc. 2d 153, 284 N.Y.S.2d 601, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1136 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1967).

Opinion

Nathaniel T. Helman, J.

This is a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR in which the petitioner seeks to review and reverse an order of the respondent which denied decontrol and fixed a maximum legal rental for the housing accommodation involved. The facts are not in dispute. The apartment involved was a parsonage on the second floor of the premises above a church. The apartment has been rented to tenants not connected with the church. The proceeds, it is averred, are used to pay off the mortgage. While the apartment is being used as a parsonage, it is exempt from rent control. However, when it is put on the rental market, even though the profit therefrom is used for religious or charitable purposes, such exemption is lost (cf. Lee Scholarship Fund, v. Hollander, 280 App. Div. [154]*154769). Nor do the premises come within decontrol under the one or two-family house regulation. To be so regulated, the premises must contain only one or two apartments. If an apartment is contained within a structure containing an accommodation other than a housing accommodation, it is ineligible for decontrol (cf. Matter of Wisotsky v. McGoldrick, 304 N. Y. 619). Within the purview of the regulations, a one or two-family house is limited to premises containing residential space only. Accordingly, as there is warrant in the record for the determination of the respondent, the decision was not arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable. Therefore, the application is denied and the petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lana & Edward's Realty v. Lipari
24 Misc. 3d 818 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2009)
Trustees of Columbia University v. Levin
71 Misc. 2d 356 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 Misc. 2d 153, 284 N.Y.S.2d 601, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-christian-baptist-church-inc-v-berman-nysupct-1967.