Trustees of Columbia University v. Levin

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Trustees of Columbia University v. Levin

71 Misc. 2d 356, 336 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1972 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1526

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 71 Misc. 2d 356 (Trustees of Columbia University v. Levin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trustees of Columbia University v. Levin, 71 Misc. 2d 356, 336 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1972 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Landlord conceded that the building is subject to rent1 control. While tenant’s lease was made when he was an instructor at the university, his employment terminated in [357]*357June of 1969 and the term of the lease expired in March of 1970. He was, nevertheless, permitted to continue to occupy the demised premises by landlord, and landlord accepted the rent for the apartment, until October 26, 1971, when the university forwarded to him a notice requiring him to remove by November 30, 1971. Permitting tenant to occupy the premises and accepting rent for the apartment for this extensive period after the expiration of tenant’s lease, while tenant was not an employee of the university, created a new tenancy from month to month subject to rent control (Real Property Law, § 232-c; Jaroslow v. Lehigh, Val. R. R. Co., 23 N Y 2d 991; Tyson v. Reynolds, 108 N. Y. 558, 563; Rasch, New York Landlord and Tenant [2d ed.], § 11; Matter of United Christian Baptist Church v. Berman, 55 Misc 2d 153). We do not reach any other aspect of this appeal.

The final judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final judgment directed in favor of tenant dismissing the petition, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Landlord conceded that the building is subject to rent1 control. While tenant’s lease was made when he was an instructor at the university, his employment terminated in [357]*357June of 1969 and the term of the lease expired in March of 1970. He was, nevertheless, permitted to continue to occupy the demised premises by landlord, and landlord accepted the rent for the apartment, until October 26, 1971, when the university forwarded to him a notice requiring him to remove by November 30, 1971. Permitting tenant to occupy the premises and accepting rent for the apartment for this extensive period after the expiration of tenant’s lease, while tenant was not an employee of the university, created a new tenancy from month to month subject to rent control (Real Property Law, § 232-c; Jaroslow v. Lehigh, Val. R. R. Co., 23 N Y 2d 991; Tyson v. Reynolds, 108 N. Y. 558, 563; Rasch, New York Landlord and Tenant [2d ed.], § 11; Matter of United Christian Baptist Church v. Berman, 55 Misc 2d 153). We do not reach any other aspect of this appeal.

The final judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final judgment directed in favor of tenant dismissing the petition, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 Misc. 2d 356, 336 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1972 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trustees-of-columbia-university-v-levin-nyappterm-1972.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack