United Capital Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

United Capital Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates

259 A.D.2d 694, 686 N.Y.S.2d 710

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 694 (United Capital Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United Capital Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates, 259 A.D.2d 694, 686 N.Y.S.2d 710 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by the appellants for reargument of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 25, 1997, which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated June 8, 1998 (251 AD2d 400).

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is denied; and it is further,

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, its decision and order in the above-entitled matter is amended by deleting from the last sentence thereof the words “the motion was properly denied”, and substituting therefor the words “the order, which was entered on March 25, 1997, was properly made”. Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Thompson and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by the appellants for reargument of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 25, 1997, which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated June 8, 1998 (251 AD2d 400).

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is denied; and it is further,

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, its decision and order in the above-entitled matter is amended by deleting from the last sentence thereof the words “the motion was properly denied”, and substituting therefor the words “the order, which was entered on March 25, 1997, was properly made”. Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Thompson and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 694, 686 N.Y.S.2d 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-capital-corp-v-183-lorraine-street-associates-nyappdiv-1999.