United Capital Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates

251 A.D.2d 400, 675 N.Y.S.2d 543
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 8, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 251 A.D.2d 400 (United Capital Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United Capital Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates, 251 A.D.2d 400, 675 N.Y.S.2d 543 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—In two related actions, inter alia, to foreclose upon a mortgage, the defendant French Bourekas, Inc., and the nonparties 183 Holding Corp., Joseph Fischer, and Joseph Fischer d/b/a 183 Holding Corp. appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), entered March 25, 1997, which denied their motion, inter alia, to redeem certain real property on behalf of the defendant French Bourekas, Inc., and intervention and redemption on behalf of the nonparties.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that the owner of the equity of redemption has a right to redeem at any time before an actual sale under a judgment of foreclosure (see, Belsid Holding Corp. v Dahm, 12 AD2d 499; see also, Bancplus Mtge. Corp. v Galloway, 203 AD2d 222; Finance Inv. Co. v Gossweiler, 145 AD2d 463; Polish Natl. Alliance v White Eagle Hall Co., 98 AD2d 400; First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. v Smith, 83 AD2d 601). Thus, the foreclosure sale which took place on March 4, 1997, extinguished, as a matter of law, the appellants’ purported rights to redeem the subject property. Accordingly, the motion was properly denied. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re: Sarah E. Sanders
S.D. New York, 2026
United States v. Chesir
171 F. Supp. 3d 63 (E.D. New York, 2016)
NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v. Moore
51 A.D.3d 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Wells Fargo Bank v. Carney
50 A.D.3d 287 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v. Jellerette
48 A.D.3d 769 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Kolkunova v. Guaranteed Home Mortgage Co.
43 A.D.3d 878 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. Brown
35 A.D.3d 682 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Bank of New York v. Ortiz
30 A.D.3d 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
NYCTL 1996-1 Trust v. LFJ Realty Corp.
307 A.D.2d 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In Re Mizuno
288 B.R. 45 (E.D. New York, 2002)
Aronian v. Double R Associates, L.P.
299 A.D.2d 432 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
United Capital Corp. v. 183 Lorraine Street Associates
267 A.D.2d 454 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D.2d 400, 675 N.Y.S.2d 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-capital-corp-v-183-lorraine-street-associates-nyappdiv-1998.