United Airlines v. CITY & CTY. OF DENVER

992 P.2d 41, 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 372, 2000 Colo. LEXIS 26, 2000 WL 104469
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedJanuary 24, 2000
Docket98SC485
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 992 P.2d 41 (United Airlines v. CITY & CTY. OF DENVER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United Airlines v. CITY & CTY. OF DENVER, 992 P.2d 41, 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 372, 2000 Colo. LEXIS 26, 2000 WL 104469 (Colo. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to review United Air Lines, Inc. v. City and County of Denver, 973 P.2d 647 (Colo.App.1998). On March 29, 1999, this Court (Justice Scott not participating) granted the Petition for Writ of Certiorari as to the following issue:

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that section 53-97(11) of the Denver Revised Municipal Code allows section 53-92(e) of the Code to be applied so as not to violate the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.

On December 6, 1999, this Court issued its opinion in General Motors Corp. v. City and County of Denver, 990 P.2d 59 (Colo.1999), and simultaneously issued an order in the instant case denying certiorari as having been improvidently granted. The Petitioners timely filed a Petition for Rehearing, as allowed under C.A.R. 54(b), in which they request us to vacate the December 6, 1999 order and reinstate the previously granted writ of certiorari. In the alternative, the Petitioners request this Court to issue a per curiam opinion if we determine that the General Motors decision properly disposes of the Petitioners’ constitutional challenge.

We view our decision in General Motors as fully and completely addressing the issue on which we granted certiorari in this case. Accordingly, the order of December 6, 1999 is withdrawn, the writ of certiorari is reinstated, and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed based on our reasoning in General Motors. The Petition for Rehearing is otherwise denied.

Justice SCOTT does not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peo v. Plemmons
2021 COA 10 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2021)
Save Cheyenne v. The City of Colorado Springs
2018 COA 18 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2018)
TABOR Foundation v. Regional Transportation District
2016 COA 102 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2016)
City of Fort Collins v. Colorado Oil and Gas Ass'n
2016 CO 28 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 2016)
City of Longmont v. Colorado Oil and Gas Ass'n
2016 CO 29 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 2016)
City of Longmont Colorado v. Colorado Oil & Gas Ass'n
2016 CO 29 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 2016)
City of Fort Collins v. Colorado Oil & Gas Ass'n
2016 CO 28 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 2016)
Qwest Corp. v. Colorado Division of Property Taxation
310 P.3d 113 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2011)
Cceg v. Cad
187 P.3d 1207 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2008)
Leverage Leasing Co. v. Smith
143 P.3d 1164 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2006)
International Paper Co. v. Cohen
126 P.3d 222 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2005)
Thorpe v. State
107 P.3d 1064 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2004)
Fonden v. U.S. Home Corp.
85 P.3d 600 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2003)
Denver Post Corp. v. Stapleton Development Corp.
19 P.3d 36 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
992 P.2d 41, 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 372, 2000 Colo. LEXIS 26, 2000 WL 104469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-airlines-v-city-cty-of-denver-colo-2000.