City of Longmont v. Colorado Oil and Gas Ass'n
This text of 2016 CO 29 (City of Longmont v. Colorado Oil and Gas Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
Colorado Supreme Court Opinions || May 2, 2016 Colorado Supreme Court -- May 2, 2016
Applying well-established preemption principles, the Supreme Court concluded that the City of Longmont’s ban on fracking and the storage and disposal of fracking wastes within its city limits operationally conflicts with applicable state law. Accordingly, the Court held that Longmont’s fracking ban is preempted by state law and, therefore, is invalid and unenforceable. The Court further held that the inalienable rights provision of the Colorado Constitution does not save the fracking ban from preemption by state law. The court thus affirmed the district court’s order enjoining Longmont from enforcing the fracking ban and remanded the case for further proceedings. These opinions are not final. They may be modified, changed or withdrawn in accordance with Rules 40 and 49 of the Colorado Appellate Rules. Changes to or modifications of these opinions resulting from any action taken by the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court are not incorporated here. Colorado Supreme Court Opinions || May 2, 2016 Back |
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2016 CO 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-longmont-v-colorado-oil-and-gas-assn-colo-2016.