Unisys Finance Corp. v. AMP Services, Inc.

593 So. 2d 232, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11591, 1991 WL 241194
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 21, 1991·No. No. 90-838·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment which denied enforcement of a guaranty.

Gordon and Robbie Case entered into a contract to guaranty certain payments to appellant in the event of default by their corporation, AMP Services, Inc. The guaranty is unconditional and promises to pay in the event their corporation does not.

Because the corporation failed to make the payments the Cases were called upon to honor their guaranty. They did not and because of that appellant is entitled to a judgment for the balance due from the corporation to appellant in the amount of $19,090.55.

That portion of the judgment denying enforcement of the guaranty in the amount of $19,090.55 is reversed and this cause is remanded for entry of judgment for appellant.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unisys Finance Corp. v. AMP Services, Inc., 593 So. 2d 232, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11591, 1991 WL 241194 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

593 So. 2d 232 (Unisys Finance Corp. v. AMP Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reeves v. State
612 So. 2d 560 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Penton v. State
605 So. 2d 1319 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Reeves v. State
593 So. 2d 232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)