Penton v. State

605 So. 2d 1319, 1992 WL 280390
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 14, 1992
Docket91-709
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 605 So. 2d 1319 (Penton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Penton v. State, 605 So. 2d 1319, 1992 WL 280390 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

605 So.2d 1319 (1992)

William Joseph PENTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 91-709.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 14, 1992.

*1320 Nancy Daniels, Public Defender, Steven A. Been, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Charles McCoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

KAHN, Judge.

William Joseph Penton appeals after a jury verdict finding him guilty of attempted aggravated battery on a law enforcement officer, aggravated battery, resisting arrest with violence, resisting arrest without violence, fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer, and operating a motor vehicle in violation of a driver's license restriction. The trial court sentenced Penton as an habitual violent felony offender. We affirm Penton's convictions without comment, but find it necessary to address his contentions concerning the sentences.

Penton argues that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive minimum mandatory habitual violent felony offender sentences for attempted aggravated battery on a law enforcement officer and aggravated battery. The record indicates that these crimes occurred on a single victim during a single criminal episode. The trial judge did not have the discretion under sections 775.021(4) and 775.084, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988), to impose consecutive minimum mandatory sentences for first degree felonies committed by an habitual violent felony offender arising from a single criminal episode, since the minimum mandatory sentences were imposed under section 775.084 and not the statute which prescribes the penalty for the offenses. Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952, 953-954 (Fla. 1992). Consequently, we vacate the minimum mandatory portions of Penton's sentences for attempted aggravated battery on a law enforcement officer and aggravated battery and remand with directions that the minimum mandatory sentence for aggravated battery be imposed concurrently with the minimum mandatory sentence for attempted aggravated battery on a law enforcement officer.

We affirm the trial court's determination that Penton was an habitual violent felon. Ross v. State, 601 So.2d 1190 (Fla. 1992). However, we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance:

DOES SECTION 775.084, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS AGAINST DOUBLE JEOPARDY AND EX POST FACTO?

See Funchess v. State, 597 So.2d 985 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), pet. for rev. pending, No. 79,963; Reeves v. State, 593 So.2d 232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), pet. for rev. pending, No. 79,386; Tillman v. State, 586 So.2d 1269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), pet. for rev. pending, No. 78,715.

Convictions AFFIRMED, sentences partially VACATED, and REMANDED.

SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Penton v. State
630 So. 2d 526 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Woods v. State
615 So. 2d 197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Wright v. State
608 So. 2d 576 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
605 So. 2d 1319, 1992 WL 280390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/penton-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.