Union Steel v. United States

2013 CIT 104
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Union Steel v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 823 F. Supp. 2d 1346
United States Court of International Trade·Decided August 8, 2013·No. 09-00130·Published

Opinion

Slip Op. 13-104

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

UNION STEEL,

Plaintiff,

and

WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Intervenor, Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Judge v. Court No. 09-00130 UNITED STATES,

Defendant,

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION and NUCOR CORPORATION,

Defendant-Intervenors.

JUDGMENT

Upon the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal of Count One (Zeroing) of the Complaint

(July 10, 2013), ECF No. 148, in accordance with the Opinion and Order issued in this case on

April 25, 2012, Slip Op. 12-56, ECF No. 131, upon consideration of all papers and proceedings

had herein, and upon due deliberation, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Final Results of Redetermination pursuant to Remand (July 15, 2011), ECF No. 115, be, and hereby are, affirmed; and it is further

ORDERED that entries of merchandise that are the subject of this litigation shall be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision in this action.

/s/ Timothy C. Stanceu Timothy C. Stanceu Judge Dated: August 8, 2013 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Union Steel v. United States, 2013 CIT 104 (cit 2013).

2013 CIT 104 (Union Steel v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.