Union Steel v. United States
This text of 2013 CIT 104 (Union Steel v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Slip Op. 13-104
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
UNION STEEL,
Plaintiff,
and
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Intervenor, Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Judge v. Court No. 09-00130 UNITED STATES,
Defendant,
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION and NUCOR CORPORATION,
Defendant-Intervenors.
JUDGMENT
Upon the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal of Count One (Zeroing) of the Complaint
(July 10, 2013), ECF No. 148, in accordance with the Opinion and Order issued in this case on
April 25, 2012, Slip Op. 12-56, ECF No. 131, upon consideration of all papers and proceedings
had herein, and upon due deliberation, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Final Results of Redetermination pursuant to Remand (July 15, 2011), ECF No. 115, be, and hereby are, affirmed; and it is further
ORDERED that entries of merchandise that are the subject of this litigation shall be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision in this action.
/s/ Timothy C. Stanceu Timothy C. Stanceu Judge Dated: August 8, 2013 New York, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 CIT 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-steel-v-united-states-cit-2013.