Union Pacific Railroad v. Holmes

74 P. 606, 68 Kan. 810, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 439
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedDecember 12, 1903
DocketNo. 13,378
StatusPublished

This text of 74 P. 606 (Union Pacific Railroad v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Union Pacific Railroad v. Holmes, 74 P. 606, 68 Kan. 810, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 439 (kan 1903).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Thomas Holmes sued the Union Pacific Railroad Company for the value of some wheat destroyed by fire set by sparks from one of defendant’s engines, and recovered judgment. The defense was that before the fire the company had offered that if plaintiff would plow a few furrows across his field its employees would burn a guard from its track to the furrows; that plaintiff refused or failed to do so; and that if this had been done the property would not have been destroyed. We find no sufficient reason for disturbing the verdict, so far as it relates to this matter. Plaintiff in error, however, also complains that the jury was permitted to allow interest on the value of the wheat from the date of the fire. This was error. (A. T. & S. F. Rld. Co. v. Ayers, 56 Kan. 176, 42 Pac. 722.)

The cause is remanded, with directions that, if plaintiff consents, the judgment be modified by the elimination of interest; otherwise, that a new trial be granted. The costs in this court will be divided.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. Ayers
42 P. 722 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 P. 606, 68 Kan. 810, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/union-pacific-railroad-v-holmes-kan-1903.